Legal Opinion
W. J. Abbott & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 1967No. Misc. 4370, 4391PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
The motion to quash subpoena presented by W. J. Abbott & Company (hereinafter referred to as Abbott Company), plaintiff at Miscellaneous No. 4370 has been consolidated with the application by the Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter referred to as the S. E. C.), for the enforcement of subpoena at Miscellaneous No. 4391 for the reason that both matters concern the same set of facts and relate to the same subpoena.
On June 1, 1967 the S. E. C., pursuant to the provisions of § 20(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(a) and § 21 (a) of the Exchange…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WickhamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1935
- Consolidated Mines v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vacuum Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- J.C. Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- DeWit v. Firstar Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Gould v. Barnes Brokerage Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1972
- Barkany Asset Recovery & Management v. Southwest Securities Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2013