Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wickham
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 17, 1935No. 2864PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNordbye, District Judge
(after-stating the facts as above).
The regulation of interstate traffic in securities is clearly within the scope o£ congressional action and an appropriate field for federal regulation. The delegation of power by Congress to the commission (in the Securities Exchange Act [IS USCA § 78a et seq.]) is not now before-the court. The alleged invalidity of the. act in that regard could not affect the right, of the petitioner to the relief. .sought here in. The defendant is not charged with the violation of any regulation or rule adopted by the commission in pursuance of such delegated power. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,167 William F. Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., John Burlington, and Glenn AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Coplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.