Legal Opinion

State v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1990No. C 880248 CR; CA A51041PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.405. He first assigns as error the trial court’s suppression of a photograph because of an alleged discovery violation. We reverse.

On the first day of defendant’s trial, the victim testified that the robber’s only facial hair had been a mustache. On the morning of the second day of trial, defense counsel notified the state and the court that he wanted to introduce a photograph into evidence that purported to show that defendant had worn a beard at about the time of the robbery. The defense had not been aware of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fugate v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API