State v. Dillard
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.405. He first assigns as error the trial court’s suppression of a photograph because of an alleged discovery violation. We reverse.
On the first day of defendant’s trial, the victim testified that the robber’s only facial hair had been a mustache. On the morning of the second day of trial, defense counsel notified the state and the court that he wanted to introduce a photograph into evidence that purported to show that defendant had worn a beard at about the time of the robbery. The defense had not been aware of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fugate v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994