Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 1989No. M784833; CA A49564PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for driving while under the influence. ORS 813.010. He assigns as error the trial court’s preclusion of a defense witness because of an alleged discovery violation. We reverse and remand.

On the morning of trial, the defense notified the state for the first time that it would be calling a witness to testify about the amount of alcoholic beverages consumed by defen- • dant. The witness would testify that he had been with defendant throughout the day and evening, including being at a tavern with him. Defendant was arrested after he left the tavern. Defense counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GirardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. LindquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. BenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. JohanesenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API