State v. Young
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for sodomy in the third degree. ORS 163.385. The indictment charged that defendant engaged in deviant sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16. Defendant assigns as error that, after finding that defendant had committed a discovery violation, the court suppressed a tape recording and transcripts of the tape of a telephone conversation between the victim and defendant’s son which occurred after the alleged offense. See ORS 135.835; ORS 135.845; ORS 135.865. 1 We affirm.
Five days before the trial began, defense counsel gave the state a list of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. JohanesenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- People v. PerezNew York Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.