Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. 86-1160; CA A44569PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for sodomy in the third degree. ORS 163.385. The indictment charged that defendant engaged in deviant sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16. Defendant assigns as error that, after finding that defendant had committed a discovery violation, the court suppressed a tape recording and transcripts of the tape of a telephone conversation between the victim and defendant’s son which occurred after the alleged offense. See ORS 135.835; ORS 135.845; ORS 135.865. 1 We affirm.

Five days before the trial began, defense counsel gave the state a list of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. State v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. JohanesenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. People v. PerezNew York Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API