Legal Opinion

Chickasha Gas & Elec. Co. v. Linn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1921No. 9919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County: Cham Jones, Judge. Action by L. C. Linn and another against the Chickasha Gas & Electric Company for damages to crops. Judgment for plaintiff named, and defendant brings error. Upon death of L. C. Linn, action revived in name of Conn Linn, executor.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Grady county by L. 0. Linn against the Chiekasha Gas & Electric Company to recover damages caused by the company maintaining a dam across the Washita river which obstructed the natural flow of the river, causing the same to overflow and damage growing crops of plaintiff upon his land. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $250. From said judgment the defendant has appealed. Since the appeal here, L. C. Linn died, and the cause has been revived in the name of Conn Linn, executor of the said estate.

During the trial of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Gray v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moore v. LinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Idustrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gilbert v. WelchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Mills v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Mills v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Jackson v. BowlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API