Legal Opinion
Pullman v. Chorney
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 2, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-C-1095PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
This case raises some novel and complex issues regarding the ability of an unsuccessful applicant for a federal oil and gas lease to seek judicial invalidation of the lease after it has been granted to another person. The complaint, filed by the plaintiff on his own behalf and “on behalf of other unsuccessful applicants similarly situated for oil and gas leases in Wyoming offered by the Bureau of Land Management under the Simultaneous Oil and Gas System,” seeks declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief for alleged fraudulent practices in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pullman v. ChorneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Naartex Consulting Corp. v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. WattDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982
- Arkla Exploration Co. v. WattDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Pullman v. ChorneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983