Legal Opinion
Pullman v. Chorney
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1983No. 81-1386PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Paul Pullman appeals from the district court’s summary judgment for the defendants in a civil suit arising out of lotteries run by the Secretary of the Interior to determine who may lease oil rights of federal property. The purpose for and mechanism of the lottery are described in detail in the trial court’s opinion, Pullman v. Chorney, 509 F.Supp. 162 (D.Colo.1981).
I
In April 1980, defendant Chorney Oil Company pleaded guilty to criminal charges arising out of violations of 43 C.F.R. §§ 3112.4-3 and 3112.6-l(c). These regulations, promulgated by the Department of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David Ray Rawls v. Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Pullman v. ChorneyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Devon Energy Production Co. v. Mosiac Potash Carlsbad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Coosewoon v. Meridian Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Arkla Exploration Co. v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Dababneh v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.