Legal Opinion
Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-1540PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on both governmental and private defendants’ motions to dismiss and on the joint motion of plaintiff and Russell Huff to intervene as a party plaintiff and to file a second amended complaint adding Russell Huff as a party plaintiff. For the reasons expressed below, defendants’ motions are granted and plaintiff’s and Russell Huff’s motion is denied.
I. Facts
Under the Department of the Interior’s simultaneous oil and gas leasing program, administered pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, 30 U.S.C. § 226(c), all…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Arkla Exploration Co. v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Sultana Crackers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Richard v. Bell Atlantic CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Bernard Koteen v. Bermuda Cablevision, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.