Legal Opinion
State v. Mordasky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 10, 2004No. AC 24178PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
In this criminal appeal, the defendant challenges the validity of a plea agreement that he entered into with the state. The principal issue is whether the defendant’s rights to due process were violated as a result of his alleged incompetence at the time of his acceptance of the plea agreement. The trial court determined that the defendant had entered his plea in a knowing and voluntary manner. We agree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In a two count information, the state charged the defendant, Keith Mordaksy, with threatening in the second degree in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. BigelowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. MonkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. DucharmeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Cooke v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.