Legal Opinion
State v. Ducharme
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 3, 2012No. AC 33216PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The defendant, Paul R. Ducharme, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. On appeal, he claims that his plea was involuntarily and was taken without substantial compliance with the provisions of Practice Book § 39-19. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On December 12, 2000, the defendant appeared before the court for the purpose of entering a guilty plea in one of four files then pending against him. The defendant at that time pleaded guilty to the crime of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DucharmeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. SimpsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. StiggleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015