Legal Opinion
Duke v. F.M.K. Construction Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 9, 2010No. Civil 2:08-CV-1055-SUPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew Duke (“Duke”) brought this diversity action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 against defendants F.M.K. Construction Services (“FMK”), Horizon Wind Energy, and Arlington Wind Power Project, a subsidiary of Horizon Wind Energy (“Horizon”). 1 Plaintiff alleges employment discrimination under ORS 659A.040 and ORS 659A.030 against all defendants and interference with employment relationship against defendants Horizon. Defendants filed this motion for summary judgment arguing that Plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Addison v. City of Baker CityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Larmanger v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Harris v. PeaceHealthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Jacobe v. Specialty Polymers, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021