Hoffschlaeger Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
The merchandise involved in these cases, which have been consolidated for trial, was invoiced as cane knives with curved edge and cane knives with straight edge. These articles were classified upon entry as knives with their handles under item 650.21 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and assessed with duty at the rate of 1 cent each and 17.5 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiffs duly protested said assessment, alleging that the knives in issue are properly classifiable within the provisions of item 651.39 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as agricultural or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3Cited by12 opinions
- Western Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- C. H. Powell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Kotake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.