Legal Opinion

Reeves v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1907No. 3615PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BBOOKS, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with knowingly having in his possession a forged instrument with intent to use and pass the same as true, and convicted and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The instrument upon which the transaction is based, as stated in the indictment, is as follows: “Daingerfield; Texas, 3—26—1907, No. The Citizens National Bank of Daingerfield pay to the order of Henry Moore $75.00 Seventy-five dollars. A. G. Wise.” Appellant moved to quash the indictment.on the ground that same contains no innuendo averments to show that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Belden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cheesebourge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. In Re LoweIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Chimene v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Chowning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API