Legal Opinion

Belden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1907No. 3684PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at four years confinement in the penitentiary; hence this appeal.

There is no statement of facts in the record. Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment, which is in the following form, so far as the charging part is concerned: “That one Jack Belden without lawful authority and with intent to injure and defraud did wilfully and fraudulently make a false instrument in writing, which said false instrument is to the tenor following:

Sherman, Texas, 1-26-1906.

M. & P. National Bank,

City.

Dear Sirs:

On pay day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Gardener v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Chowning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Massingill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API