Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chowning v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1938No. 20055Published

The opinion states the case.

1ConcurrenceHawkins, Judge

I concur with my brethren in the disposition of this case by the original opinion and the opinion on rehearing. However, I think it proper to say we have examined all the authorities cited by appellant in his brief and motion for rehearing and also those furnished in a supplemental list since the case was orally presented. Among them are the following: Millsap v. State, 43 S. W. 1015; Lynch v. State, 53 S. W. 693; Black v. State, 42 Tex. Cr. R. 585, 61 S. W. 478; Carrell v. State, 184 S. W. 190; Young v. State, 84 Tex. Cr. R. 179; 206 S. W. 197; Joiner v. State, 46 Tex. Cr. R. 408, 80 S. W.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lasater v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. San Patricio County v. McClaneTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. BolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API