Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Stancil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1960No. 22PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Defendant Stancil assigns as error the refusal of the court to allow his motion for compulsory nonsuit. G.S. 1-183.:'It is our opinion that the evidence, when considered .in the light lhost favorable to plaintiffs, is sufficient to take the case to the jury. '■

We refrain from a detailed discussion and analysis of the evidence. Suffice it to say that it is sufficient to justify the.jury in concluding:Plaintiffs were passengers for hire. Rivera neglected to switch from the auxiliary fuel tank to the left wing tank before reducing altitude and going into a bank preparatory to landing. He knew or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Smith v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Roger E. Woolsey v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Keith v. United Cities Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Diehl v. KofferCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API