Frick v. Sinon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
—An action to quiet title, commenced October 29, 1883. The court below adjudged in effect that the plaintiff had acquired the legal title to the land described in the complaint by an adverse possession continued for the statutory period. Appellant contends, it appears from the evidence, that the plaintiff and defendant were at the commencement of the suit and at the trial tenants in common of the .premises.
There was evidence that the predecessor in interest of *339the plaintiff had the actual, exclusive, and adverse possession, under color of title, of the whole of the land in controversy, from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Furlong v. CooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Miller v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Carpentier v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by10 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- King v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. QuimbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.