Legal Opinion

Helbig v. Bonsness

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

So far as material in passing upon this appeal, it suffices to note that the evidence establishes and the court found that on February 18, 1936, at the same time and place and as parts of but one and the same transaction, Emil Kulin executed under seal a unilateral option, wherein he agreed to give to the plaintiff, Charles Helbig, an option to buy a farm prior to April 1, 1937, upon payment of $2,500, and Kulin and Helbig also executed, as lessor and lessee, respectively, a lease of the farm for one year, under which Helbig covenanted to pay $75 on April 1st and likewise on October 1, 1936;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. AlbertzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chandler v. GaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Woldenberg v. RiphanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Seaman v. McNamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bank of Sheboygan v. FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BralyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Last v. PuehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Barr v. GranahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Livesey Enterprises v. Smith Management, Inc. (In Re Smith Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Balla v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API