Legal Opinion
Hanauer v. Republic Building Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:
Wickhem, J.
The sole question for determination upon this appeal is the constitutionality of sec. 269.58, Stats. *51Plaintiff contends that this section is repugnant to sec. 10, art. I, of the United States constitution, prohibiting the enactment by any state of a law impairing the obligation of contracts. This conclusion is asserted to follow by reason of the postponement until the completion of foreclosure proceedings of the right of plaintiff to sue at law upon the bonds. This is contended to impair valuable rights of the plaintiff under his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Corstvet v. Bank of DeerfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Finnegan v. Lincoln Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Bank of Sheboygan v. FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.