Armstrong v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
Bill Armstrong and wife sued Bob L. Marshall for damages caused by the alleged wrongful killing of their son Walter Armstrong. They sued both as parents and as sole heirs at law of deceased. The damages claimed were: $8,000, loss of financial support; $5,000, mental and physical pain suffered by deceased prior to his death; and $343, burial expenses, itemized as funeral ($198), cemetery lot ($90), and tombstone ($55). Marshall plead self-defense. The judgment, upon a special issue verdict, was in favor of Marshall, and Mr. and Mrs. Armstrong have appealed.
Appellants’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spencer v. SchellTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Phoenix Assurance Co. of London v. StobaughTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Wallace v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- In re the Estate of BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- King v. MorrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Landers v. BF Goodrich CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Union Transports, Inc. v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Canales v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Harper v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.