Phoenix Assurance Co. of London v. Stobaugh
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge HICKMAN
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
Each party is both plaintiff in error and defendant in error in this court. We shall therefore, for convenience, designate them as they were in the trial court, wherein Stobaugh was plaintiff and the insurance company was defendant. Plaintiff sued defendant upon its policy of fire insurance covering a building owned by him. The judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of the policy was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the cause remanded. 62 S. W. (2d) 678.
An issue of fact was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Royal Insurance Co. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. StrayhornTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Hough v. GrapotteTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Davis v. MorrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Farmers' Mill & Elevator Co. v. HodgesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Iley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
- Texas Employers' Insurance v. LightfootTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Snow v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.