Smith v. Walker
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss appeal. Appeal from Yan Burén. (Mills, ¿T.) Injunction bill. Defendants appeal. For definition of good will, see Morga/n v. Schuyler 79 N. Y. 490; Crutwell v. Lye 17 Yes. 335; Boon v. Moss 70 N. Y. 473; Sander v. Iloffman 64 N. Y. 248 ; Glen & Hall Mfg Co. v. Hall 61 N. Y. 226: it follows the ownership of the business: Pars.
Read the full summary
Motion to dismiss appeal. Appeal from Yan Burén. (Mills, ¿T.) Injunction bill. Defendants appeal. For definition of good will, see Morga/n v. Schuyler 79 N. Y. 490; Crutwell v. Lye 17 Yes. 335; Boon v. Moss 70 N. Y. 473; Sander v. Iloffman 64 N. Y. 248 ; Glen & Hall Mfg Co. v. Hall 61 N. Y. 226: it follows the ownership of the business: Pars. Part. 262; and see 3 Kent’s Com. 64; Hammond v. Douglas 5 Yes. 539; Crawshay v. Collins 15 Yes. 224; Featherstonhaugh v. Fenwick 17 Yes. 312; Lewis v. Langdon 7 Sim. 421; Staats v. Howlett 4 Den. 559 ; 2 Lindl. Part. 855; Kellogg v. Totten 16 Abb. Pr. 35…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam. Motion to dismiss an appeal in chancery on the ground that the decree appealed from is not a final decree.
The decree perpetually enjoins the defendants, their agents and servants “ from marking, painting or stenciling for sale, and from selling fanning-mills marked, painted or stenciled in imitation of the complainant’s fanning-mill and from using upon fanning-mills manufactured or sold by them, or either of them the words ‘Grain Grader & Seed *458Separator, Lawton, Michigan,’ in imitation of complainant’s fanning-mills and from, selling or offering for sale fanning mills not…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
- Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. SpearThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
- Caswell v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Newman v. . AlvordNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Wysong Corp. v. M.I. IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Helm v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.