Legal Opinion

Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1941No. 8612PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Mishawaka Rubber and Woolen Manufacturing Company, filed a complaint against the appellee, the S. S. Kresge Company, for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition. The court found for appellant, but it claims the relief granted was inadequate and on this appeal it asks that the judgment be extended to award it further and other relief.

For many years appellant has been engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of footwear of various kinds and for more than thirty-five years, has been manufacturing rubber heels for use on its boots and shoes.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Wynn Oil Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Way Service Corporation, and Thomas A. Warmus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Yoshida International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  4. Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API