Legal Opinion
James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1942No. 8934PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below,'appeals from a decree dismissing its petition. The action commenced as a suit for the infringement of Jamar patent No. 1,892,892, relating: to artificial fishing bait, and Wooster design patent No. 93,370, in the- same art; also for infringement of registered! trademark No. 154,046, “Head-Oin Bas-ser” and for infringement of trademark No. 345,384, consisting of a red stripe-applied to one or more edges of booses ar labels for fishing tackle, and !^also for unfair competition in simulating the form, appearance and marking of appellant’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Samson Cordage Works v. Puritan Cordage MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.