Legal Opinion
Kidder v. H & B MARINE, INC.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-2892, 88-3636PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Oreste and Thelma Kidder, assert that defendants violated the Comprehensive Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”), Pub.L. No. 99-272, 100 Stat. 222 (1986) (codified at 29 U.S.C. 1161-68) (Supp. IV. 1986), by failing to provide them with COBRA continuation coverage under a group health plan. 1
Rather than receiving COBRA continuation coverage, plaintiffs were provided with conversion to an individual plan after Mr. Kidder left his employment with defendant H & B Construction, Inc. (“HB Construction”). After Mrs. Kidder was subsequently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- The Taggart Corporation v. Life and Health Benefits Administration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Dehner v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Krogh v. ChamberlainDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
- Clark v. Golden Rule InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oreste Kidder and Thelma Kidder v. H & B Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Monty J. Degruise v. Sprint Corporation, Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Jachim v. KUTV INC.District Court, D. Utah · 1992
- Myers v. King's Daughters ClinicDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1996
- David Hager v. Todd G. RowanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.