Legal Opinion

Lommen v. Adolphson & Peterson Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1969No. 41378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict or a new trial.

On January 13, 1964, plaintiff suffered serious injuries as the result of a fall from a scaffold while installing a folding partition during the construction of the Minnetonka West Junior High School gymnasium. The folding partition was designed to operate upon a track supported by a large, steel, I-shaped, double bar joist which extended across the full 80-foot width of the ceiling of the gymnasium approximately 20 feet above the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Van Tassel v. HillernsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Berry v. HaertelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Gfroerer v. Menard, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API