Lommen v. Adolphson & Peterson Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict or a new trial.
On January 13, 1964, plaintiff suffered serious injuries as the result of a fall from a scaffold while installing a folding partition during the construction of the Minnetonka West Junior High School gymnasium. The folding partition was designed to operate upon a track supported by a large, steel, I-shaped, double bar joist which extended across the full 80-foot width of the ceiling of the gymnasium approximately 20 feet above the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Van Tassel v. HillernsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Berry v. HaertelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Gfroerer v. Menard, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021