Legal Opinion

Kline Zoning Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1959No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

The lower court incorrectly granted a variance from a thirty foot set back requirement in an R-4 residential district in Lower Merion Township, permitting the enclosure of a front porch which would encroach upon the required minimum front yard line by approximately three and one-half feet. The zoning board having determined that no unnecessary hardship had been shown denied the variance. The lower court decreed that the board had abused its discretion and granted a variance to appellees.

The applicant desires to enclose the front porch because his wife suffers from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Volpe AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Gold v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. English v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Nettleton v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Greth Development Group, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Heidelberg TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Ludwig v. Zoning Hearing Board of Earl TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Alpine, Inc. v. Abington Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API