Legal Opinion

Gold v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1958No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

The City of Philadelphia appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which reversed the Zoning Board of Adjustment in its decision refusing appellees, owners by the entirety, a permit allowing appellee, Samuel Gold, to conduct a barber shop in the basement of his home. Appellee had been refused such permit on a prior application, but had not appealed from the board’s refusal.

Appellee’s home is in a district zoned “D” residential, wherein no commercial uses are permitted. However, the zoning regulations do permit “accessory uses,” as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Volpe AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Bonasi v. Haverford Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Taddeo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1955

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Kline Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Draving v. Lower Southampton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Agnew v. Bushkill Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API