Larsen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

*419 OPINION

CASTILLE, Justice.

Appellants raise two related issues in this appeal. First, appellants contend that the Commonwealth Court exceeded its scope of review in reversing the trial court’s grant of appel-lees’ variance request which would have allowed them to build a 400 square foot deck in the rear of their residence to provide a play area for their child. Second, appellants contend that the zoning board did not commit a manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law which would merit the Commonwealth Court’s reversal of the trial court’s affirmance of the variance grant. For the reasons…