Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2008No. Civil Action 04-0798PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the motion to dismiss of claimants Pavel Lazarenko and Alexander Lazarenko on their own behalf and on behalf of Ekateri-na Lazarenko and Lecia Lazarenko (“Claimants” or “Lazarenko Claimants”). 1 Plaintiff, the United States of America, has filed an action in rem against various bank accounts located in foreign nations around the world containing assets totaling over $250 million. The United States brings this action pursuant to two separate provisions of the civil forfeiture statute — 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 18…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. $1,071,251.44 of Funds Associated With Mingzheng Int'l Trading Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.