Legal Opinion

Keystone Land & Development Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Xerox Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 2003No. 02-35847PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge.

This diversity case arises from a contract dispute. Plaintiff Keystone Land & Development Company (“Keystone”) claims that it formed two binding contracts with Defendant Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”): a contract to buy a building owned by Xerox, and a contract to negotiate the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for that building. Keystone filed suit for breach of contract in Washington state court and, to secure its claims, Keystone filed a lis pendens notice for the property. Xerox removed the case to federal court and filed a counterclaim for damages, and attorney’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave SwiekertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Keystone Land & Development Co. v. Xerox Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Marlene Herrera v. Command Security Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. South Kitsap Family Worship Center v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. SOUTH KITSAP FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API