Legal Opinion
National Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2004No. Nos. 03-35235, 03-35237PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge McKEOWN
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has met its obligation to comply with state water quality standards, as required by the Clean Water Act. Appellants National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, Idaho Rivers United, Inc., American Rivers, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Washington Wildlife Federation, and Idaho Wildlife Federation (collectively referred to as “NWF”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Jose Emilio Cortez-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Harper v. Poway Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- American Rivers, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.