Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Stillman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1890No. 6365PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Archer. Tried below before Hon. R. F. Arnold, Special District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, Presiding Judge.

—T. E. Stillman brought this suit against J. W. Pentecost and S. Abercrombie on a promissory note for 82880 and *59110 per cent interest, and 10 per cent attorney fees if collected by law, executed by Pentecost and payable to the order of Abercrombie, secured by vendor’s lien on 1280 acres of land, and to foreclose the lien.

The note was endorsed as follow: “ Pay Thomas S. Greenman or order. Protest waived and payment guaranteed in Yew York exchange. S. Abercrombie.” And also: “Pay to the order of T. E. Stillman. Elizabeth. G. Stillman, administratrix,” etc.

Attached to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. RugelyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Blum v. LogginsTexas Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Solinsky v. Fourth National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ringle v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Japhet v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Bloch v. Rio Grande Valley Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API