Legal Opinion

Ringle v. Waggoner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1922No. 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Hemphill County; W. R. Ewing, Judge. Action by W. D. Waggoner against A. A. Ringle and others. Judgment for plaintiff and certain defendants, and defendant Rin-gle and others bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

On October 17, 1913, A. A. Ringle and wife Malinda Ringle executed and delivered to Joseph Rodegeb seven promissory notes, the first in the sum of $577.83, and the others in the sum of $500 each, payable one, two, three, four, five, six and seven years after date, respectively. At the same time they executed a deed of trust to J. S. Hood, trustee, conveying section No. 3 in block No. 1. Hemphill county, Tex., to secure the payment of said notes. On September 24, 1918, Ringle sold the said section of land to L. S. Palmer, and as part of the consideration for said sale Palmer assumed' the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. March v. HuyterTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Arlington Heights Realty Co. v. Citizens' Ry. & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Matlock v. GloverTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brown v. ChenoworthTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Palm v. ChernowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pecos Mercantile Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Bellah v. DennisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Caffarelli Bros. v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. In re BrooksDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API