Legal Opinion

Bloch v. Rio Grande Valley Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1916No. 641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Defendant in error brought this suit against Bloch to recover upon three drafts each in sum of $100 and one in sum of $200, drawn by Juveneio Estrada upon Bloch. The $100 drafts were dated March 2, March 4, and March 5, 1915, respectively, and the $200 draft was dated March 10, 1915. Appellee, in its petition, alleged the facts stated, and these further averments mere made, viz.: That the three $100 drafts were drawn payable to the order of J. Goodman at sight and the $200 draft was drawn payable to the order of Testamentaria de Jose Goodman at sight; that said drafts were presented to and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Abercrombie v. StillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Solinsky v. Fourth National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gamer v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ringle v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Intertype Corp. v. Sentinel Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Lindahl v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Lindahl v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Young v. MapleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API