Legal Opinion
Klotz v. Hoyt
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2008No. 18A02-0707-CV-556Published
1Opinion of the Court
880 N.E.2d 1234 (2008)
Stan KLOTZ, Appellant-Plaintiff,
v.
Sarah HOYT and Chrissy Kornmann, Appellees-Defendants.
No. 18A02-0707-CV-556.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
February 25, 2008.
David J. Karnes, Dennis, Wenger & Abrell, P.C., Muncie, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Alan K. Wilson, Muncie, IN, Attorney for Appellee Sarah Hoyt.
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Tenant-landlord disputes are all too common. Here, two tenants undisputedly stopped paying rent after the first one and one-half months of their lease, did a substantial amount of damage, to the inside of the residence, and abandoned the residence…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Duchon v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pinnacle Properties v. SaulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Raider v. PeaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.