Legal Opinion

Femedeer v. Haun

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2000No. 99-4082, 99-4093PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This case primarily concerns whether Utah’s sex offender notification scheme, which includes posting information about convicted sex offenders on the Internet, violates the Double Jeopardy and Ex Post Facto Clauses of the U.S. Constitution when applied to offenders who committed their crimes prior to the effective date of the enabling legislation. Granting in part Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the district court ruled that the scheme violated those constitutional provisions with respect to offenders who had completed their sentences and probation as of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Doe v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. WootenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. W.N.J. v. YocomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API