Legal Opinion

Lazaro v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1997No. 94-04-10725-E; CA A87490PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiffs, a group of Eastern Oregon ranchers, initiated this action to force the Division of State Lands (DSL) to grant them 20-year grazing leases with automatic 20-year renewal options and to obtain reformation of those leases to insert a missing clause regarding their valuation. The trial court ordered DSL to grant the 20-year leases with the automatic lease renewals, but it declined to reform the leases to add the missing valuation clauses. We reverse the portion of the judgment ordering DSL to grant the longer lease terms and otherwise affirm.

We begin with the parties’ arguments…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. SullensOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Premier Technology v. OR. STATE LOTTERYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API