State v. Sullens
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
The issue before this court is whether the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence is reviewable on appeal.
After a judgment of conviction of first degree burglary and theft was entered against defendant, he moved for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. ORCP 64B(4). 1 The trial court did not rule on defendant’s motion within the statutorily specified time limit and, therefore, the motion was deemed denied. 2
Defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction and assigned the denial of the motion for new trial as the only error.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Walther v. SAIF CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. TooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- In re the Marriage of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.