Premier Technology v. OR. STATE LOTTERY

*126WARREN, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing plaintiffs claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It assigns error to the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ORCP 47, and to its denial of plaintiffs motion to compel defendant’s production of certain documents, ORCP 46. We reverse.

On February 3, 1992, plaintiff and defendant executed a document entitled “Video Lottery Terminal Lease Agreement.” It provides, in part:

“WHEREAS, [plaintiff] submitted a response to OSL RFP 91-07 and a video lottery game(s) manufactured by the [plaintiff] in accordance…