Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Wimes
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 2001No. S-00-199PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Scott L. Marshall appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the order of the director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) revoking Marshall’s operator’s license. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the district court erred in affirming the revocation of Marshall’s operator’s license in light of the DMV’s alleged due process violation in refusing to issue a subpoena duces tecum directing the individual who tested Marshall’s blood alcohol level to appear at Marshall’s revocation hearing.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The findings of fact set forth by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. DavlinNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hass v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Chase v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- ML Manager v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Kempke v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.