Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Tudor Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 1, 1996No. 96-177Published
1Opinion of the Court
925 S.W.2d 395 (1996)
325 Ark. 226
Barbara ROGERS, Appellant,
v.
TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 96-177.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
July 1, 1996.
W. Asa Hutchinson, Fort Smith, for appellant.
Harry S. Hurst, Little Rock, for appellee.
BROWN, Justice.
Two points are raised in this appeal. The first is one of jurisdiction and concerns whether appellant Barbara Rogers effected her appeal in timely fashion. We believe that she did, and we deny the motion to dismiss by appellee Tudor Insurance Company. The second point is raised by Rogers and concerns alleged error by the trial court in granting…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Brady v. Alken, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.