Legal Opinion

Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Maples

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 1993No. 92-669PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This tax case involves a dispute between the appellant, Omega Tube and Conduit Corporation (Omega), and the Pulaski County Assessor and Collector, appellees (the County). The question is whether raw materials used to produce products to be shipped outside this State attain a “situs” here and thus are subject to personal property taxation. The Trial Court held that the controlling Statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 26-26-1102 (1987), is unambiguous and requires the tax to be levied. In response to Omega’s request for a declaratory judgment as to the meaning of the Statute, we…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing OpticiansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Bishop v. LINKWAY STORES, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Richard's Honda YamahaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Caplener v. Bluebonnet Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API