Hill v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Thomas D. Hill was found guilty of disposing of property subject to a lien and sentenced to imprisonment for one year. He asserts the following points for reversal:
I
1. The verdict herein is contrary to both the law and the evidence.
2. There is no evidence to support a conviction of the defendant on a charge of disposing of property subject to a lien.
3. The criminal statute under which this defendant was prosecuted does not apply to the facts in this situation.
4. The trial court erred in that defendant’s motions for dismissal of the charges and for a directed verdict…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Willis v. O'BRIENWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wellington Oil Co. v. MaffiTexas Supreme Court · 1941
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Earl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Tryon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.