Legal Opinion
Graham v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 11, 2003No. 28181-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 P.3d 684 (2003)
Todd Noel GRAHAM, Respondent,
v.
STATE of Washington, Appellant.
No. 28181-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
March 11, 2003.
Michael Gordon Borge, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.
Richard Alan Melnick, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.
HOUGHTON, P.J.
The State appeals from an order restoring Todd Graham's right to own and possess a firearm, arguing that the trial court incorrectly interpreted RCW 9.41.040. We agree and reverse.
FACTS[1]
On May 5, 1995, Graham was convicted of second degree child rape, a sex offense and a class A felony. RCW…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- JTL Group, Inc. v. New Outlook, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. R.P.H.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MihaliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.