Legal Opinion

Midzak v. Midzak

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Wife sought and was granted divorce on the grounds of extreme emotional cruelty. Wife was awarded the marital home, along with most of the marital assets. The trial court awarded no alimony at the time of the divorce, but reserved the right to award alimony in the future if the circumstances of the parties required it. Primary physical custody of the parties’ minor child was awarded to Husband contingent on finding a suitable place to live. No award of child support was made. Husband appealed the grant of the divorce on the grounds of extreme emotional…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Goehry v. GoehrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hautala v. HautalaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Schieffer v. SchiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hill v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DivanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API