Hautala v. Hautala
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Bernard Hautala appeals a divorce decree claiming the trial court committed reversible error in allowing hearsay testimony about his military pay, in considering nongarnishable income in computing child support and alimony, and in awarding Phyllis rehabilitative alimony.
Facts
Bernard and Phyllis had been married almost nineteen years at the time of trial. Bernard was a Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force with over nineteen *880years of active service. Phyllis worked sporadically at minimum wage jobs after their children were born. They were both high school graduates.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Krage v. KrageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.