Legal Opinion

Hautala v. Hautala

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1988No. 15632PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Bernard Hautala appeals a divorce decree claiming the trial court committed reversible error in allowing hearsay testimony about his military pay, in considering nongarnishable income in computing child support and alimony, and in awarding Phyllis rehabilitative alimony.

Facts

Bernard and Phyllis had been married almost nineteen years at the time of trial. Bernard was a Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force with over nineteen *880years of active service. Phyllis worked sporadically at minimum wage jobs after their children were born. They were both high school graduates.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Krage v. KrageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API