Legal Opinion
State v. Divan
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 2006No. 23889PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Charles Divan appeals an order revoking his suspended imposition of sentence contending the probation conditions were impossible to comply with and the trial court abused its discretion in concluding they were violated. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] On January 26, 2001, an information was filed charging Divan with twenty-seven counts of possessing stolen property. All the stolen property in this case consisted of cattle owned by Divan’s neighbors that were discovered on his property. Divan entered into a plea agreement in which he agreed to plead nolo contendere to one…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Mary A. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Bruce BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. William Lewis HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Shauntel Martin, Also Known as BooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- State v. EsquilinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.