State v. Hackett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
The State appeals from an order of dismissal for violation of the speedy trial rule. The issue presented is whether the speedy trial period is recommenced when defense counsel files and serves on the prosecutor a notice of appearance following a defendant's failure to appear for trial and his subsequent arrest on a bench warrant.
I
The facts are not disputed. The defendant was arraigned on a charge of attempting to elude a police vehicle on August 23, 1988. A criminal trial confirmation hearing was set for November 10, 1988, pursuant to former Snohomish County Local Criminal Rule 3.3(f)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Tiffin v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. AdamskiWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HackettWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992